> Yes, as she says- it does add to the depth - but social mission by itself
> is not sufficient to make poetry better. And I do think it is neither
> necessory nor sufficient.
A general, "philosophical" question: Isn't it the case that
viplavaatmaka kavitvam at its highest level would deal with some
eternal questions of the human condition and therefore will not
be transient but eternal? Sorry I can't produce any examples here,
but is it justified to say that viplavaatmaka kavitvam by its
nature is ephemeral?
Bapa Rao