Re: AIR - samasyA puraNalu

Nasy Sankagiri (narayans@dunx1.ocs.drexel.edu)
Tue, 30 Jan 1996 19:34:53 -0500 (EST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Madhava Kumar Turumella: "Re: Re:About Yaj~nam(2) and Sri Baparao's suggestion"
Previous message: Veluri, Rao: "Re: About Yaj~nam(2) and Ramakrishna's doubts!"
Maybe in reply to: Madhava Kumar Turumella: "AIR - samasyA puraNalu"
Next in thread: Prasad Chodavarapu: "Re: AIR - samasyA puraNalu"

>> 3) kavitala vinuvAru nEDu kalarE jagatin
>
>anu samasya ki nA pUraNa.
>
>divilO bhuvilO peddana
>kavImdrulakE krushnarAyu manamalarimcE
>kavitalu sAdhyamanucu nA
>kavitala vinuvAru nEDu kalarE jagatin
>
:-)) prasAd guroo, ippuDE, rAmakRshNa gaaritOnoo, rAm Dokka tOnoo kandam
raayaDamlO 'ja' gaNamtO vaccE jaTTeelanu gurinci mATlaDutoo vunnaa. intalO
meeru idi. SreeSree ceppinaTTu 'naaluginTa' ja gaNam cakkagaa cigircaaru
gaanee, utsaaham ekkuvai, ayidinTlO kUDaa adE vEsESaaru. :-)) kidding
aside, I think that your pUraNam is very impressive for a first attempt,
prticularly, the bhaavam. If you change the second line to

kavikE Sree kRshNarAyu kOrkenu deercE,

all the requirements will be satisfied, without much damage to the meaning.
If you are willing to change some more, we can write,

kavikE Sree kRshNarAyu kavitaa tRshNan
savarimpaga sAdhyamanucu na....

Congratulations.
Regards
NAsy

Next message: Madhava Kumar Turumella: "Re: Re:About Yaj~nam(2) and Sri Baparao's suggestion"
Previous message: Veluri, Rao: "Re: About Yaj~nam(2) and Ramakrishna's doubts!"
Maybe in reply to: Madhava Kumar Turumella: "AIR - samasyA puraNalu"
Next in thread: Prasad Chodavarapu: "Re: AIR - samasyA puraNalu"