RE: Correction please!

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Rao Veluri: "A parody to kRshNa sAstri gaari "nEnu kooDa""
• Previous message: PALANA: "candruni camatkAracana #1"

Sri Subba Rao wrote:

>gaNapatiyai kavi pravara kalpanakun kaviyai suvighna bhanjanaam
>gaNapatiyai  umAtanaya kamra guNOjjvala mUrtiyai bhuvin
>gaNapati saccidAtmaka jagadguru mUrti  nitAnta yOgi, sat
>gaNapatiyai brOchu gAvuta sukha prachayimpu SatAvadhAnamun.


>The point is  both these padams take the letters 'vi' in 'kavi pravara'
>in 1st padam and 'kha' in 'sukha prachayimpu' as guruvus even though the
>next letter has ra-vattu and starts a new word.

>I wish to know if there are any typos in the poem. 


First there are several typos in the poem. Leaving them aside, 
kavipravara as well as the other word (a typo again) are not to be 
considered  two words. All samAsa's are to be considered single words. 
That removes a lot of confusion, I guess. sahajamagu prEma or 
gaNapati brOchu in the above poem (after your correction) are distinctly 
two words. Otherwise, ti in gaNapati will become guruvu again. 
As Pillalamarri garu pointed out, the rules are mostly unambiguous. 

Regards,

Sridhara Rao

• Next message: Rao Veluri: "A parody to kRshNa sAstri gaari "nEnu kooDa""
• Previous message: PALANA: "candruni camatkAracana #1"